We use cookies to personalize content and to analyze our traffic. Please decide if you are willing to accept cookies from our website.

Prompts Versus Data: Building AI That Understands Your Business

Mon., 19. January 2026 | 4 min read

Previously, users focused on well-crafted prompts, prompt engineering, to get the most from AI models. Prompt engineering worked well for one-off tasks, but it showed its limit when applications grew more complex or required up-to-date data or long-term memory. Context engineering solved this problem by providing AI models with additional knowledge to perform better. This context can be embedded in the prompt directly or retrieved from an external source. Both techniques can be used separately or together. Context engineering complements prompt engineering rather than replaces it. In essence, prompts guide the AI model while context provides the knowledge. CIOs and AI leaders, who misapply prompt or context engineering, risk creating AI systems with inconsistent outputs, leading to wasted AI investment and loss of trust. Understanding when to use each approach is critical to building accurate and stable AI systems.

How Prompt …

Tactive Research Group Subscription

To access the complete article, you must be a member. Become a member to get exclusive access to the latest insights, survey invitations, and tailored marketing communications. Stay ahead with us.

Become a Client!

Similar Articles

RAG Time: Tuning Into Cost-Effective LLM Adoption Strategies for SMEs

RAG Time: Tuning Into Cost-Effective LLM Adoption Strategies for SMEs

Large language models (LLMs) have disrupted many industries and pushed businesses, including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), to attempt AI application implementations. LLMs are fine-tuned on business data to handle a specific domain, but this process is too costly and resource intensive for SMEs. AI engineers can replace fine-tuning with a vector database, which acts as long-term memory and allows an LLM to use up-to-date business data.
Just Cache It (Part 2): Prompt Caching vs RAG

Just Cache It (Part 2): Prompt Caching vs RAG

Businesses are continuing to enhance their efficiency by using AI. This increases the need for LLMs that perform well on enterprise tasks. Fine-tuning is not a viable method because it is costly. Prompt caching (context caching) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) are more suitable. AI engineers should read this article to learn more about these two methods to create cost-effective LLMs that perform well on their enterprise data.