We use cookies to personalize content and to analyze our traffic. Please decide if you are willing to accept cookies from our website.

RAG Time: Tuning Into Cost-Effective LLM Adoption Strategies for SMEs

Mon., 15. April 2024 | 5 min read

Large language models (LLMs) gained widespread popularity after the release of ChatGPT–based on GPT-3. This led to many businesses, including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), to try leveraging ChatGPT and other LLMs to enhance their applications. LLMs handle general tasks well but may struggle with tasks that rely on private business data because this data was not used in training and is not available online. Fine-tuning the model on business data can solve this problem and improve performance for specific domains. SMEs that find fine-tuning to be too costly and resource intensive should consider a vector database as a cheaper and more resource-friendly alternative. AI engineers can use Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) through vector databases to ensure SMEs create innovative AI applications while reducing cost and resources.

Why SMEs Will Benefit from Vector Databases

Creating an LLM from scratch is usually a no-go for SMEs …

Tactive Research Group Subscription

To access the complete article, you must be a member. Become a member to get exclusive access to the latest insights, survey invitations, and tailored marketing communications. Stay ahead with us.

Become a Client!

Similar Articles

Just Cache It (Part 2): Prompt Caching vs RAG

Just Cache It (Part 2): Prompt Caching vs RAG

Businesses are continuing to enhance their efficiency by using AI. This increases the need for LLMs that perform well on enterprise tasks. Fine-tuning is not a viable method because it is costly. Prompt caching (context caching) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) are more suitable. AI engineers should read this article to learn more about these two methods to create cost-effective LLMs that perform well on their enterprise data.